Quantcast
BP accused of trying to silence science on spill | The Mesh Report

BP accused of trying to silence science on spill

the Mesh Report Staff July 23, 2010 1

LONDON (AFP) – The head of the American Association of Professors accused BP Friday of trying to buy the silence of scientists and academics to protect itself after the Gulf oil spill, in a BBC interview.

“This is really one huge corporation trying to buy faculty silence in a comprehensive way,” said Cary Nelson.

BP is facing lawsuits after the oil spill, which has destroyed the livelihoods of many people along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

A copy of a contract offered to scientists by BP, which the BBC said it had obtained, said scientists are not allowed to publish the research they do for the oil giant.

They are also not allowed to speak about the data for at least three years or until the government gives final approval for the company’s restoration plan for the whole of the Gulf, said the British broadcaster.

BP said it had hired more than a dozen scientists “with expertise in the resources of the Gulf of Mexico,” according to a statement given to the BBC.

Bob Shipp, the head of marine sciences at the University of SouthAlabama, said BP’s lawyers had approached him and wanted his whole department.

“They contacted me and said we would like to have your department interact to develop the best restoration plan possible after this oilspill,” he said.

“We laid the ground rules — that any research we did, we would have to take total control of the data, transparency and the freedom to make those data available to other scientists and subject to peer review.

“They left and we never heard back from them.”

Nelson warned BP’s actions could be “hugely destructive”.

“Our ability to evaluate the disaster and write public policy and make decisions about it as a country can be impacted by the silence of the research scientists who are looking at conditions,” he said.

“It’s hugely destructive. I mean at some level, this is really BP versus the people of the United States.”

BP said it “does not place restrictions on academics speaking about scientific data,” according to the BBC.

The environmental disaster began on April 20 when the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers. The rig sank two days later rupturing the pipe that connected it to the well.

3 Great Option Trades for 2013


The 3 trades my staff just dropped on my lap are the most exciting trades I have seen in over 15 years. Each of these 3 trades has the ability to reach between 100% to 1000% in profit. Normally I would only give this to our premium subscribers, but I would like to see you profit from them. These trades have a limited shelf life, DOWNLOAD My 3 Best Trades for 2013 Today, completely free…


Click Here to Claim Your 100% FREE Copy



  • http://www.thetexasring.com Linda Brady Traynham

    This sounds to me like a perfectly ordinary contract for such a report, as opposed to what we mean by “business as usual,” which is now defined as “funny business, as usual.”

    When I write an analytical project report my “work product” is the possession of the corporation which engaged me, and I am forbidden by contract even to admit I wrote for the firms, far less ever divulge any details. Just knowing who the analyst was can provide valuable insight to competitors.

    The data belongs to BP; it does not belong to the world. BP is paying for the work. BP has a right to an early start on any advances which come from a very expensive bit of data collection.

    My professional opinion is that this has nothing to do with a cover up. (That would be some other department!) My analysis is that BP hopes to gain an edge in knowledge and technology, and that the president of the American Association of Professors is not only out of his league but meddling. The scientists were probably offered a take it or leave it deal with stipulations on non-disclosure. Shipp from the University of South Alabama was out of line when he demanded control and disposition of the data, and he cost his department a fat contract.

    BP is to be commended for consulting a “local” university with presumably superior notion of the demands and conditions. No, I do not own any BP stock, but if it gets beaten down to about $7 I might pick some up. Tony looks entirely too calm, and I’m pretty sure some basic rearrangements are going on that will save money in the long run which can be excused by Obama’s demands and so forth.

    Consider airlines after 9-11. When the dust cleared, unprofitable routes had been eliminated, flight frequency had been curtailed, prices had gone up, meals were a thing of the past, and new charges had been instituted. I rather think that behind the sleepy eyes and stiff upper lip is a mind quite keen enough to restructure under cover of “20 BN is a lot of boodle,” and “we will pay all JUSTIFIED claims.” Tony never forgets to stick that warning in.

    I would have walked away from UnivSouthAL, too, and would ignore the yapping of liberal journalists and “academics” if I were running BP.

    Regards,

    Linda Brady Traynham